4.6 Article

Effect of risk-adjusted morbidity after coronary diabetes on mortality and artery bypass surgery

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 1570-1576

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.035

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Diabetes is commonly regarded as a risk factor for mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods. Between April 1997 and December 2002, 6,033 consecutive patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. Eight hundred and fourteen (13.5%) patients had diabetes (530 oral-dependent, 284 insulin-dependent). Patients with diet-controlled diabetes were classified as nondiabetics. Deaths occurring over time were described using Kaplan-Meier techniques. To control for differences in patient characteristics, we constructed a propensity score (for diabetes) and this was included along with the comparison variable in multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher for diabetic patients in the univariate analyses; however, this association disappeared after adjusting for the propensity score. Further analyses found that insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with an increased incidence of acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio 4.15;p = 0.002), deep sternal wound infection (adjusted odds ratio 2.96; p = 0.039), and prolonged postoperative stay (adjusted odds ratio 1.60; p = 0.017). Oral-controlled diabetes was not associated with any of these outcomes. Four hundred and ninety-eight (8.3%) deaths occurred during the study follow-up. After adjusting for patient characteristics, the adjusted hazard ratio of midterm mortality for diabetes was 1.35; p = 0.013. Conclusions. Insulin-dependent diabetes has a significant impact on in-hospital morbidity. Although diabetic patients are not at increased risk of in-hospital mortality, longevity is significantly decreased during a five-year follow-up period. (c) 2005 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据