4.6 Article

Sentinel node biopsy is not sensible in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours

期刊

EJSO
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 364-368

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.11.006

关键词

breast cancer; lymph-node metastases; multifocal; sentinel node biopsy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours. Methods. Nine hundred and eighty-four patients with invasive breast cancer and SNB were studied. The histological tumour size was larger than 3 cm in 70 patients. The advantages of SNB like avoiding axillary clearance (AC) or more accurate staging by detecting micrometastases or parasternal. sentinel. node metastases were evaluated in relation to the tumour size. Results. Axillary metastases were detected in 351/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and in 50/70 patients with larger tumours (p << 0.0001). Micrometastases or isotated tumour cells only, were observed in 134/351 node positive patients with tumours not larger than 3 cm and in 10/50 cases with larger tumours (p=0.022). Parasternal. sentinel node metastases were detected in 17/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and 2/70 patients with larger tumours (p= ns). AC was omitted because of tumour negative sentinel node findings 168 of the 232 patients with stage T1 a-b turnours and 281 of those 489 with T1c turnours. Twenty of the 70 patients with tumours larger than 3 cm avoided AC. Conclusions. SNB is not sensible in breast cancer patients with tumours larger than 3 cm, because of the small proportion avoiding AC after SNB. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. AR rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据