4.5 Article

The length dependence of muscle active force: considerations for parallel elastic properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 5, 页码 1666-1673

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01045.2004

关键词

force-length relationship; models of skeletal muscle; series elasticity; skeletal muscle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to choose between two popular models of skeletal muscle: one with the parallel elastic component in parallel with both the contractile element and the series elastic component ( model A), and the other in which it is in parallel with only the contractile element ( model B). Passive and total forces were obtained at a variety of muscle lengths for the medial gastrocnemius muscle in anesthetized rats. Passive force was measured before the contraction ( passive A) or was estimated for the fascicle length at which peak total force occurred ( passive B). Fascicle length was measured with sonomicrometry. Active force was calculated by subtracting passive ( A or B) force from peak total force at each fascicle or muscle length. Optimal length, that fascicle length at which active force is maximized, was 13.1 +/- 1.2 mm when passive A was subtracted and 14.0 +/- 1.1 mm with passive B ( P < 0.01). Furthermore, the relationship between double-pulse contraction force and length was broader when calculated with passive B than with passive A. When the muscle was held at a long length, passive force decreased due to stress relaxation. This was accompanied by no change in fascicle length at the peak of the contraction and only a small corresponding decrease in peak total force. There is no explanation for the apparent increase in active force that would be obtained when subtracting passive A from the peak total force. Therefore, to calculate active force, it is appropriate to subtract passive force measured at the fascicle length corresponding to the length at which peak total force occurs, rather than passive force measured at the length at which the contraction begins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据