4.6 Article

Constitutive thrombospondin-1 overexpression contributes to autocrine transforming growth factor-β signaling in cultured scleroderma fibroblasts

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 166, 期 5, 页码 1451-1463

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62362-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) has been reported to activate the latent complex of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), the major effects of which in mesenchymal cells is stimulation of the synthesis of ECM. Previous reports suggested the involvement of an autocrine TGF-beta loop in the pathogenesis of scleroderma. In this study, we examined whether TSP-1 plays a role in maintaining the autocrine TGF-beta loop in scleroderma. TSP-1 expression was increased in scleroderma patients compared with in healthy controls in vivo and in vitro. TGF-beta blocking antibody or TGF-beta 1 antisense oligonucleotide markedly reduced the up-regulated TSP-1 expression in scleroderma fibroblasts but had little effect on normal fibroblasts. The expression of TSP-1 is up-regulated in scleroderma fibroblasts, possibly at the post-transcriptional level just like in normal fibroblasts stimulated with exogenous TGF-beta 1. TSP-1 blocking peptide or antisense oligonucleotide had an inhibitory effect on the up-regulated alpha 2(1) collagen and phosopho-Smad3 levels in scleroderma fibroblasts but had little effects on normal fibroblasts. The transient overexpression of TSP-1 up-regulated a2(1) collagen and phospho-Smad3 levels in normal fibroblasts but had no major effect on scleroderma fibroblasts. Furthermore, these effects of transiently overexpressed TSP-1, which possibly occurred via the activation of latent TGF-beta 1, were abolished by the TGF-beta 1 antisense oligonucleotide. These results indicate that the constitutive overexpression of TSP-1 may play an important role in autocrine TGF-beta signaling and accumulation of ECM in scleroderma fibroblasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据