4.4 Article

Regulation of expression of the early growth response gene-1 (EGR-1) in malignant and benign cells of the prostate

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 198-207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20153

关键词

EGR-1; PC-3; BPH-1; phosphorylation; DNA binding; prostate cancer

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA15083] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 060920] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Expression of the early growth response gene-1 (EGR-1) is elevated in prostate cancer and correlates with tumor progression. This study provides insight into the mechanism(s) that regulate EGR-1 expression and activity in malignant and benign prostate cells. METHODS. Western blotting and in vitro pulse labeling were used to examine EGR-1 protein levels and half-life in malignant (PC-3) and benign (BPH-1) prostate cell lines. EGR-1 functional ability was assessed by transient transfections with an EGR-1 promoter driven luciferase plasmid and electromobility shift assays (EMSAs) to assess DNA binding of the EGR-1 protein. Protein levels of casein kinase II (CKII) were evaluated by Western blotting. RESULTS. PC-3 cells maintain high steady-state levels of EGR-1 protein, in part due to a longer half-life of EGR-1 protein. BPH-1 cells responded to mitogenic stimuli with increased EGR-1 protein levels, and enhanced transcriptional activity. In contrast, PC-3 cells showed no response to stimuli. DNA binding of EGR-1 was higher in BPH-1 cells than in PC-3 cells. This appears to be related to the heavily phosphorylated state of EGR-1 in PC-3 cells which is correlated with increased levels of CKII found in these cells. CONCLUSIONS. PC-3 cells maintain a long lasting, heavily phosphorylated pool of EGR-1, which binds poorly to DNA and responds poorly to mitogenic stimulus. BPH-1 cells, in contrast, maintain a more responsive, less phosphorylated EGR-1 pool. These findings suggest that EGR-1 expression and activity is differentially regulated in PC-3 and BPH-1 cell lines. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据