4.4 Article

Pharmacological outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 382-387

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.01.008

关键词

epilepsy; antiepileptic drugs; treatment; response; side effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been examined in 780 adult and adolescent patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy presenting with a range of seizure types and epilepsy syndromes over a 20-year period. Carbamazepine (CBZ, n = 312), sodium valproate (VPA, n = 315), and lamotrigine (LTG, n = 249) were the most common AEDs prescribed as monotherapy. More patients with localization-related epilepsies became seizure free with LTG (63%) than with CBZ (45%, P = 0.006) or VPA (42%, P = 0.006). For idiopathic generalized epilepsies a greater proportion of patients achieved control with VPA (68%) than with CBZ (31%) or LTG (45%). In particular, more patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy responded to VPA (75%) compared with LTG (39%, P = 0.014). Seizure freedom was achieved with modest or moderate daily doses (median CBZ 400 mg, VPA 1000 mg, (LTG) 150 mg) of all three AEDs in the majority of patients achieving remission. Time to first seizure did not differ among these three drugs when given as first treatment. Adverse effects leading to withdrawal were more frequent with CBZ (16%,) than with VPA (7%, P = 0.03) or LTG (7%, P = 0.018). In patients failing initial monotherapy, response to a combination of two AEDs (27%) was not different from that with alternative monotherapy (32%). The majority of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy responding to treatment did so rapidly and completely with moderate doses of AEDs, with no differences in time to first seizure. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据