4.6 Article

Cellular expression of protamine 1 and 2 transcripts in testicular spermatids from azoospermic men submitted to TESE-ICSI

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 11, 期 5-6, 页码 373-379

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gah169

关键词

azoospermia; in situ hybridization; protamine; testis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) combined with ICSI is used to treat azoospermia. However, the factors that influence the outcome of ICSI in this situation are ill-defined. We sought to investigate the expression of protamine 1 (PRM1) and protamine 2 (PRM2) transcripts in testicular spermatids from obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermic men with impaired spermatogenesis. The relationship between PRM1 and PRM2 transcript levels and the TESE-ICSI outcome was evaluated. The cellular expression of PRM1 and PRM2 mRNAs in single testicular spermatids from 41 azoospermic patients (in whom testicular spermatozoa were subsequently recovered and submitted for TESE-ICSI) was determined by radioactive in situ hybridization. Group I contained seven men with congenital, obstructive azoospermia and whose testicular biopsies indicated quantitatively normal spermatogenesis. Group II consisted of 18 azoospermic men with moderately impaired spermatogenesis. Sixteen men with non-obstructive azoospermia and severely deranged spermatogenesis (i.e. mixed atrophy with small foci of spermatids and spermatozoa) constituted group III. The spermatids of men with severely deranged spermatogenesis exhibited significant lower PRM1 mRNA expression than in the other patient groups. There were no significant inter-group differences in PRM2 mRNA expression. Spermatid PRM1 expression was lower in non-pregnant couples than in pregnant couples. The low number of spermatids in cases of mixed atrophy with small spermatogenic foci is associated with significantly lower PRM1 expression and a lower pregnancy rate. These results emphasize the role of PRM1 as a potentially critical factor in post-ICSI embryonic development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据