4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions - Effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 712-718

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0363546504271747

关键词

active robotic surgery; robotic/universal force-moment sensor (UFS) testing system; anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; femoral tunnel position

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Knee kinematics and in situ forces resulting from anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with 2 femoral tunnel positions were evaluated. Hypothesis: A graft placed inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament will restore knee function better than a graft placed at a position for best graft isometry. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees were tested in response to a 134-N anterior load and a combined 10-N-m valgus and 5-N-m internal rotation load. A robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply loads, and resulting kinematics were recorded. An active surgical robot system was used for positioning tunnels in 2 locations in the femoral notch: inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament and a position for best graft isometry. The same quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used for both tunnel positions. The 2 loading conditions were applied. Results: At 300 of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation in response to the anterior load for the intact knee was 9.8 +/- 3.1 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 13.8 +/- 4.6 mm; position 2: 16.6 +/- 3.7 mm; P < .05). There was a significant difference between the 2 tunnel positions. At the same flexion angle, the anterior tibial translation in response to the combined load for the intact knee was 7.7 +/- 4.0 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 10.4 +/- 5.5 mm; position 2: 12.0 +/- 5.2 mm; P < .05), with a significant difference between the tunnel positions. Conclusion: Neither femoral tunnel position restores normal kinematics of the intact knee. A femoral tunnel position inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament results in knee kinematics closer to the intact knee than does a tunnel position located for best graft isometry. Clinical Relevance: Anatomical femoral tunnel position is important in reproducing function of the anterior cruciate ligament.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据