4.5 Article

Blood pressure response to chronic intake of coffee and caffeine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 921-928

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000166828.94699.1d

关键词

meta-analysis; coffee; caffeine; blood pressure; randomized controlled trials; clinical trials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Coffee is a widely consumed beverage and small health effects of substances in coffee may have large public health consequences. It has been suggested that caffeine in coffee increases the risk of hypertension. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of coffee or caffeine and blood pressure (BP). Data identification BP trials of coffee or caffeine published between January 1966 and January 2003 were identified through literature databases and manual serach. Study selection A total of 16 studies with a randomized, controlled design and at least 7 days of intervention was selected, comprising 25 strata and 1010 subjects. Data extraction Two persons independently obtained data on sample size, type and duration of intervention, changes in BP and heart rate (HR), and subjects' characteristics for each trial. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results A significant rise of 2.04 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10- 2.99] in systolic BP and 0.73 mmHg (95% Cl, 0.14-1.31) in diastolic BP was found after pooling of coffee and caffeine trials. When coffee trials (n = 18, median intake: 725 ml/day) and caffeine trials (n = 7, median dose: 410 mg/day) were analysed separately, BP elevations appeared to be larger for caffeine [systolic: 4.16 mmHg (2.13-6.20); diastolic: 2.41 mmHg (0.98-3.84)] than for coffee [systolic: 1.22 mmHg (0.52-1.92) and diastolic: 0.49 mmHg (-0.06-1.04)]. Effects on HR were negligible. Conclusions Regular caffeine intake increases BP. When ingested through coffee, however, the blood pressure effect of caffeine is small. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据