4.7 Article

Serotonin 5-HT2C receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in rat choroid plexus after fluoxetine and citalopram treatments

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 419-425

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.11.005

关键词

5-HT2C receptors; fluoxetine; citalopram; chronic treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) bind directly to various neurotransmitter receptors. The clinical effects of SSRIs appear gradually during weeks of treatment, suggesting a role for adaptive changes in neurotransmitter receptors. Most clinically used antidepressants, e.g. fluoxetine, bind to 5-HT2C receptors. When administered chronically, many antidepressants elicit adaptive regulation of 5-HT2C receptors. The present study was conducted in order to determine the effects of acute and chronic fluoxetine and citalopram treatments on the density and function of 5-HT2C receptors in the rat choroid plexus. Acute and chronic treatments followed by phosphomositide (PI) hydrolysis assays and quantitative receptor autoradiography were performed. Acute (single-dose) treatment with neither drug significantly affected basal or 5-HT-stimulated PI hydrolysis, but acute citalopram (20 mg/kg) treatment increased both agonist and antagonist binding to 5-HT2C receptors. Chronic (14 days) citaloprain treatment (20 mg/kg) increased the maximal PI hydrolysis response by 40%, but fluoxetine lacked this effect. The present data suggest that sensitisation of 5-HT2C receptor-mediated intracellular signal transduction may play a role in the effects of citalopram. In contrast, fluoxetine treatment does not functionally sensitise 5-HT2C receptors. Thus, functional 5-HT2C receptor sensitisation is not a common effect of antidepressants, but the differential effects may explain some of the pharmacodynamic differences seen with these drugs, especially upon repeated administration. (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据