4.7 Article

Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, cereal fiber, and plasma adiponectin concentration in diabetic men

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 1022-1028

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1022

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 55075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 35464, HL 65582] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Adiponectin may improve insulin sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and ameliorate glycemic control. However, few studies have evaluated dietary predictors of plasma adiponectin levels, especially among subjects with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - To examine the associations of dietary of load, glycemic index, and fibers with plasma adiporieClin levels, we conducted a crosssectional analysis in 780 diabetic men from the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study. Dietary information was obtained in 1986, 1990, and 1994 using semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaires. RESULTS - After adjustment for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, aspirin use, HbA(1c), history of hypertension or hypercholesterolemia, and fiber intake, dietary glycemic index and glycemic load were inversely associated With plasma adiponectin in a dose-dependent fashion (P for trend = 0.005 for glycemic index and 0.004 for glycemic load). Adiponectin levels were 1.3 % lower in the highest quintile of dietary glycemic index than in the lowest quintile. For dietary glycemic load, adiponectin levels were 18 % lower in the highest quintile than in the lowest. In contrast, high intake of cereal fiber was associated with increased plasma adiponectin levels, adjusting for lifestyle factors and dietary glycemic load (P for trend = 0.003). Adiponectin levels were 19 % higher in the highest quintile than in the lowest quintile. Higher magnesium intake was also associated with increased plasma adiponectin. CONCLUSIONS - Diets low in glycerine load and high in fiber may increase plasma adiponectin concentrations in diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据