3.9 Article

Eccentric resistance training of the knee extensor muscle: Training programs and neuromuscular adaptations

期刊

ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 183-198

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/IES-150580

关键词

Eccentric exercise; resistance training; quadriceps; muscle adaptation

资金

  1. CAPES-Brazil
  2. CNPq-Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: This review is aimed at describing the methods used in knee extensor eccentric resistance training in healthy subjects and at evaluating the adaptations in strength, activation and structure of this muscle group. METHODS: Seventy-five studies were carefully analyzed and 30 are considered in this review. RESULTS: Training programs comprised of 1-4 sessions per week for a period ranging from four to 20 weeks with isokinetic dynamometers or conventional strength training machines were considered. Isokinetic eccentric training programs included 1-6 sets of 6-12 repetitions, while isotonic eccentric training programs consisted of 3-7 sets of 5-10 repetitions. Eccentric strength gains per training session (0.45-3.42%) were typically found to be greater compared to isometric (0.08-1.30%) and concentric (0.23-1.44%) strength gains. Quadriceps activation was improved in tests performed eccentrically and isometrically, but there is poor evidence of increased concentric activation and reduced co-activation of antagonistic muscles. Regarding muscle structure, significant hypertrophic responses have been demonstrated through increases in anatomical/physiological cross-sectional area, muscle thickness and fiber diameter. Most studies measuring muscle architectural changes reported increased fascicle lengths without changes in pennation angle. Adaptations in fiber type distribution were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Strength gains following knee extensor eccentric training are caused by neural and structural adaptations, and may contribute to physical fitness in healthy populations and health improvement in patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据