4.6 Review

Fetal fatty acid oxidation disorders, their effect on maternal health and neonatal outcome: Impact of expanded newborn screening on their diagnosis and management

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 78R-86R

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000159631.63843.3E

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD 048867-01, K08 HD048867] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [5R01DK061762-05, R01 DK061762] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation disorders (FAOD) are recessively inherited errors of metabolism. Newborns with FAOD typically present with hypoketotic hypoglycemia, metabolic acidosis, hepatic failure, and cardiomyopathy. Late presentations include episodic myopathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, and arrhythmias. Sudden unexpected death can occur at any age and can be confused with sudden infant death syndrome. Some FAOD are associated with intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity, and pregnancy complications in the heterozygous mother, such as severe preeclampsia, acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP), or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. Maternal pregnancy complications occur primarily in mothers carrying a fetus with long-chain L-3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency or general trifunctional protein deficiencies. FAOD as a group represent the most common inborn errors of metabolism, and presymptomatic diagnosis of FAOD is the key to reduce morbidity and avoid mortality. The application of tandem mass spectrometry to newborn screening provides an effective means to identify most FAOD patients presymptomatically. At the beginning of 2005, 36 state newborn screening programs have mandated or adopted this technology resulting in a marked increase in the number of asymptomatic neonates with FAOD diagnosed. To ensure the long-term benefits of such screening programs, pediatricians and other health care providers must be educated about these disorders and their treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据