4.5 Article

Lead and lead isotopes in agricultural soils of Europe - The continental perspective

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 532-542

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.12.012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eurometaux
  2. Cobalt Development Institute (CDI)
  3. European Copper Institute (ECI)
  4. Nickel Institute, Europe
  5. European Precious Metals Federation (EPMF)
  6. International Antimony Association (i2a)
  7. International Manganese Institute (IMnI)
  8. International Molybdenum Association (IMoA)
  9. ITRI Ltd.
  10. International Zinc Association (IZA)
  11. International Lead Association-Europe (ILA-Europe)
  12. European Borates Association (EBA)
  13. (REACH) Vanadium Consortium (VC)
  14. (REACH) Selenium and Tellurium Consortium
  15. EuroGeoSurveys

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lead isotopes are widely used for age dating, for tracking sources of melts, sediments, Pb products, food and animals and for studying atmospheric Pb contamination. For the first time, amap of a Pb isotope landscape at the continental-scale is presented. Agricultural soil samples (A(p)-horizon, 0-20 cm) collected at an average density of 1 site/2500 km(2) were analysed for Pb concentration and Pb isotopes (Pb-206, Pb-207, Pb-208). Lead concentrations vary from 1.6 to 1309 mg/kg, with a median of 16 mg/kg. Isotopic ratios of Pb-206/Pb-207 range from 1.116 to 1.727 with a median of 1.202. The new data define the soil geochemical Pb background for European agricultural soil, providing crucial information for geological, environmental and forensic sciences, public health, environmental policy and mineral exploration. The European continental-scale patterns of Pb concentrations and Pb isotopes show a high variability dominated by geology and influenced by climate. Lead concentration anomalies mark most of the known mineralised areas throughout Europe. Some local Pb anomalies have a distinct anthropogenic origin. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据