4.6 Article

Risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved a sustained virological response to interferon therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 752-758

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03800.x

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; interferon; retrospective cohort study; risk factor; sustained virological response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aim: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who responded to interferon (IFN) treatment with clearance of serum HCV RNA may rarely develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study was to elucidate the risk factors for liver carcinogenesis among such patients. Methods: In total, 126 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) to IFN monotherapy, which was defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA in the serum at 6 months after completion of treatment, were enrolled and possible risk factors for HCC were analyzed. Results: During the observation period of 66 +/- 36 months after cessation of IFN treatment, five (4.0%) of the 126 patients developed HCC. The cumulative incidence of HCC at 3, 5 and 10 years was estimated to be 0.9, 4.7 and 7.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of HCC was significantly higher among patients with severe fibrosis (F3 or F4) than among patients with no or mild fibrosis (F0 to F2) in the liver before treatment (P = 0.007); among patients with alcohol intake of >= 27 g/day than among patients with that of < 27 g/day (P = 0.015); and among patients who were >= 65 years old than among patients who were < 65 years old at the start of treatment (P = 0.026). Conclusions: Patients with CHC who had severe fibrosis, who had regularly taken moderate amounts of alcohol, or who were >= 65 years at the start of IFN treatment should be carefully followed to detect small and controllable HCC, even after eradication of HCV. (C) 2005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据