4.6 Article

Recombinant, live-attenuated tetravalent dengue virus vaccine formulations induce a balanced, broad, and protective neutralizing antibody response against each of the four serotypes in rhesus monkeys

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 9, 页码 5516-5528

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.9.5516-5528.2005

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three tetravalent vaccine (TV) formulations of previously described monovalent dengue (DEN) virus vaccine candidates were compared to a tetravalent formulation of wild-type DEN viruses (T-wt) for replication in SCID mice transplanted with human liver cells (SCID-HuH-7) or for replication and immunogenicity in rhesus monkeys. TV-1 consists of recombinant DENI, -2, -3, and -4, each with a 30-nucleotide deletion in the 3 ' untranslated region (Delta 30). TV-2 consists of rDEN1 Delta 30, rDEN4 Delta 30, and two antigenic chimeric viruses, rDEN2/4 Delta 30 and rDEN3/4 Delta 30, both also bearing the Delta 30 mutation. TV-3 consists of rDEN1 Delta 30, rDEN2 Delta 30, rDEN4 Delta 30, and a 10-fold higher dose of rDEN3/4 Delta 30. TV-1 and TV-2 were attenuated in SCID-HuH-7 mice with minimal interference in replication among the virus components. TV-1, -2, and -3 were attenuated in rhesus monkeys as measured by duration and peak of viremia. Each monkey immunized with TV-1 and TV-3 seroconverted to the four DEN components by day 28 with neutralization titers ranging from 1:52 to 1:273 and 1:59 to 1:144 for TV-1 and TV-3, respectively. TV-2 induced low antibody titers to DEN2 and DEN3, but a booster immunization after 4 months increased the neutralizing antibody titers to greater than 1:100 against each serotype and elicited broad neutralizing activity against 19 of 20 DEN subtypes. A single dose of TV-2 induced protection against wild-type DEN1, DEN3, and DEN4 challenge, but not DEN2. However, two doses of TV-2 or TV-3 induced protection against DEN2 challenge. Two tetravalent formulations, TV-2 and TV-3, possess properties of a successful DEN vaccine and can be considered for evaluation in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据