4.5 Article

Experimental study of cadmium interaction with periphytic biofilms

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 418-427

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.12.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR [ANR-08-CES-014]
  2. French National Programs for Basic Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Study addresses the interaction of Cd with natural biofilms of periphytic diatoms grown during different seasons in metal-contaminated and metal-non-contaminated streams, along a tributary of the Lot River, France Specifically, it aims to test whether the biofilms from contaminated sites have developed a protective mechanism due to high Cd exposure Towards this goal, reversible adsorption experiments on untreated biofilms were performed in 0.01 M NaNO(3) with a pH ranging from 2 to 8, Cd concentration from 0.5 to 10,000 mu g/L and exposure time from 1 to 24 h Two types of experiments, pH-dependent adsorption edge and constant-pH Langmuirian-type isotherms were conducted Results were adequately modeled using a Linear Programming Model It was found that the adsorption capacities of natural biofilm consortia with respect to Cd do not depend on season and are not directly linked to the growth environment The biofilms grown in non-contaminated (4 6 ppb Cd in solid) and contaminated (570 ppb Cd in solid) settings exhibit similar adsorption capacities in the Cd concentration range in solution of 100-10,000 mu g/L but quite different capacities at low Cd concentration (0 5-100 mu g/L), unexpectedly, the non-contaminated biofilm adsorbs approximately 10 times more Cd than the contaminated one. It is therefore possible that the strong low-abundant ligands (for example, phosphoryl or sulfhydryls) are already metal-saturated on surfaces of biofilm grown in the contaminated site whereas these sites are still available for metal adsorption in samples grown in non-contaminated sites (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据