3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Visual and statistical modeling of facial movement in patients with cleft lip and palate

期刊

CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 245-254

出版社

ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
DOI: 10.1597/04-010.1

关键词

circumoral movement; cleft impairment; dynamic analysis

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE13814-01A1, R01 DE013814] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To analyze and display facial movement data from noncleft subjects and from patients with cleft lip and palate by using a new dynamic approach. The hypothesis was that there are differences in facial movement between the patients with cleft lip and palate and the noncleft subjects. Setting: Subjects were recruited from the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry Orthodontic and Craniofacial Clinics. Patients, Participants: Sixteen patients with cleft lip and palate and eight noncleft control subjects. Interventions: Video recordings and measurements in three dimensions of facial movement. Main Outcome Measures: Principal component (PC) scores for each of six animations or movements and dynamic modeling of mean animations. Statistics: Multivariate statistics were used to test for significant differences in the PC mean scores between the patient groups and the noncleft groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in PC mean scores between the patient groups and the noncleft groups; however, the variability of the effect of clefting on the soft tissues during animation was noted when the noncleft data were used to establish a normal scale of movement. Compensatory movements were seen in some of the patients with cleft lip and palate, and the compensation was not unidirectional. Conclusion: Measures of mean movement differences as summarized by PC scores between patients with cleft lip and palate and noncleft subjects may be misleading because of extreme variations about the mean in the patient group that may neutralize group differences. It may be more appropriate to compare patients to a noncleft normal scale of movement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据