4.5 Review

Resuspension of urban soils as a persistent source of lead poisoning in children: A review and new directions

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 2021-2039

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. IUPUI School of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban soils act as the repository for a number of environmental burdens, including Pb. Significant attention has been devoted to reducing Pb burdens to children with outstanding success, but the fact that blood Pb levels above 10 mu g/dL are disproportionately found in children living in many USA cities (15-20% in some cities compared to a national average of less than 2%) indicates that not all Of the Sources have been eliminated. Although the health risk of fine particulates has begun to raise concerns in cities, little attention has been paid to Pb associated with these Particulates and the potential role of this pathway for continued Pb burdens of urban youth. This review summarizes recent work on particulate resuspension and the role of resuspension of Pb-enriched urban soils as a continued source of bio-available Ph both outside and inside homes, then presents recent efforts to model Ph burdens to children based on the atmospheric parameters that drive particulate resuspension. A strong seasonal relationship is found between atmospheric particulate loading and blood Ph levels in children, and new particulate loading models are presented for a range of US cities involved in the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program. These seasonal particulate loading models have implications for a number of respiratory health impacts, but can also be used to Calculate seasonal patterns in bio-available Pb redistribution onto contact surfaces (the primary pathway for ingestion-related uptake in toddlers) and assist clinicians in interpreting time-specific blood Ph tests. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据