4.7 Article

Morale in the oldest old:: the Umea 85+study

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 249-255

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afi044

关键词

aged; 80 and over; morale; psychological well-being; depression; epidemiologic studies; elderly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: to describe morale among the oldest old, and to investigate which social, functional and medical factors are associated with morale in this population. Design: a cross-sectional study. Setting: a population-based study in the municipality of Umea, a city in Northern Sweden. Subjects: half of the 85-year-old population, and the total population of 90-year-olds and >= 95-year-olds (95-103) were asked to participate (n = 319) and 238 were interviewed. Methods: structured interviews and assessments during home visits, interviews with relatives and caregivers and review of medical charts. The 17-item Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale (PGCMS) was used to measure morale. Participants were assessed with the Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Index, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and a symptom questionnaire. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to find independent factors to explain the variation in the PGCMS score. Results: eighty-four per cent (n = 199) of those interviewed answered the PGCMS. Three-quarters had middle range or high morale. GDS score, type of housing, previous stroke, loneliness and number of symptoms, adjusted for age group and sex, explained 49.3% of the variance of total PGCMS score. Conclusions: a large proportion of the oldest old had high morale. The most important factors for high morale were the absence of depressive symptoms, living in ordinary housing, having previously had a stroke and yet still living in ordinary housing, not feeling lonely and low number of symptoms. The PGCMS seems applicable in the evaluation of morale among the oldest old.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据