4.5 Article

What do we actually mean by 'sociotechnical'? On values, boundaries and the problems of language

期刊

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 137-142

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.027

关键词

Sociotechnical theory; Contingency theory; Human relations movement; Shipping research; Usability; Personal development; Operating technology; Air accidents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The term 'sociotechnical' was first coined in the context of industrial democracy. In comparing two projects on shipping in Esso to help define the concept, the essential categories were found to be where systems boundaries were set, and what factors were considered to be relevant 'human' characteristics. This is often discussed in terms of values. During the nineteen-sixties and seventies sociotechnical theory related to the shop-floor work system, and contingency theory to the organisation as a whole, the two levels being distinct. With the coming of information technology, this distinction became blurred; the term 'socio-structural' is proposed to describe the whole system. IT sometimes is the operating technology, it sometimes supports the operating technology, or it may sometimes be mistaken for the operating technology. This is discussed with reference to recent air accidents. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据