4.7 Article

Multi-element electrothermal AAS determination of 11 marker elements in fine ambient aerosol slurry samples collected with SEAS-II

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 538, 期 1-2, 页码 303-312

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.062

关键词

electrothermal AAS; slurry sampling; fine airborne particles; simultaneous multi-element; PM2.5 reference material

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-element simultaneous electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) methods were developed for determining 11 elements, in three analytical groups (group-1, predominately crustal elements, Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Cr; group-2, tracers of coal and oil combustion as well as other anthropogenic sources, Se, As, Pb, and Ni; and group-3, tracers of municipal incinerator aerosol-Zn and Cd), in aqueous slurry of ambient fine airborne particles, collected, at 30 min intervals with the University of Maryland-Semicontinuous Elements in Aerosol Sampler-II (SEAS-II). Combined effects of acid (0.2% v/v nitric acid) and ultrasonic treatment (15 min) improved metals recovery and slurry stability. Linear calibration ranges were improved by using a 50 mL min(-1) carrier gas flow (mini-flow) during the atomization stage. However, analytical sensitivity for group-1 and 3 elements was compromised. Palladium (4 mu g) and hydrogen (5% in Argon) were found to be effective modifiers for group-1 and 2 elements. A fast furnace temperature program was developed for group-3. Detection limits for the eleven marker elements by the SEAS-II-ETAA approach were compared with traditional filter X-ray fluorescence, laser ablation-ICPMS, and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) techniques used in air quality studies. The efficacy of the analytical method was evaluated by analyzing interim urban PM2.5 reference material, collected in Baltimore, by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Gaithersburg, MD. Results obtained by the ETAAS methods agreed well with the results obtained by NIST using INAA. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据