4.7 Article

Radioprotective effect of sesamol on γ-radiation induced DNA damage, lipid peroxidation and antioxidants levels in cultured human lymphocytes

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 209, 期 3, 页码 225-235

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.12.009

关键词

sesamol; radioprotection; micronuclei; dicentric aberration; antioxidants; lymphocytes; gamma-radiation; catalase; peroxidase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sesamol pretreated (1, 5 and 10 mu g/ml) lymphocytes were exposed to different doses of gamma-radiation, i.e., 1, 2 and 4 Gray (Gy) and the cellular changes were estimated by using cytokinesis blocked micronucleus assay (MN), dicentric aberration (DC), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), reduced glutathione (GSH) and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx). Radiation significantly increased MN, DC frequencies, TBARS levels and decreased GSH and antioxidant enzyme levels in a dose dependent manner. The highest damage to lymphocytes was observed at 4 Gy irradiation. On the other hand, sesamol pretreatment significantly decreased MN, DC frequencies, TBARS levels and increased GSH levels and SOD, CAT and GPx activities in a concentration dependent manner. At I Gy irradiation all concentrations of sesamol (1, 5 and 10 mu g/ml) significantly protects the lymphocytes from radiation damage. At 2 Gy irradiation 5 and 10 mu g/ml of sesamol shows significant radioprotection. Since the highest damage was observed at 4 Gy irradiation both 1 and 5 mu g/ml of sesamol pretreatment were not sufficient to protect the lymphocytes from radiation damage but 10 mu g/ml of sesamol significantly (p < 0.05) protects the lymphocytes from radiation effect. Thus, sesamol pretreatment gives significant protection to cultured human lymphocytes against gamma-radiation induced cellular damage. The possible mechanism involved in the radioprotective influence of sesamol is discussed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据