4.1 Article

Comparison of methyl eugenol metabolites, mitochondrial COI, and rDNA sequences of Bactrocera philippinensis (Diptera: Tephritidae) with those of three other major pest species within the dorsalis complex

期刊

APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 275-282

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s13355-013-0183-5

关键词

Bactrocera philippinensis; Bactrocera dorsalis species complex; Pheromone; Methyl eugenol; Mitochondrial DNA

资金

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
  2. JSPS from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [23380035]
  3. JST
  4. International Atomic Energy Agency [16066, 16160]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23380035] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Males of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and some of its sibling species have strong affinity for methyl eugenol (ME). Methyl eugenol ingested by male flies is biotransformed in the crop to two ME metabolites that eventually accumulate in the rectal gland, which is known to serve as a reservoir for B. dorsalis sex pheromones. When fed with ME, males of laboratory and wild B. philippinensis Drew and Hancock selectively accumulated two metabolites, 2-allyl-4,5-dimethoxyphenol and (E)-coniferyl alcohol, in the rectal gland, as was seen for B. dorsalis sensu stricto, B. invadens Drew, Tsuruta and White, and B. papayae Drew and Hancock. Phylogenetic analysis of COI and rDNA sequence data of these four taxa also revealed a close relationship among B. philippinensis, B. dorsalis s.s., B. invadens, and B. papayae (all four are members of the dorsalis species complex). This result corroborates pheromone analysis. The usefulness of pheromonal analysis as a chemotaxonomy tool to complement molecular and other analysis in differentiation of closely related sibling species within the Bactrocera dorsalis complex, for which use of morphological characters had been inadequate, is highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据