4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of pesticides in tomatoes using laboratory-made NH2 and C18 solid-phase extraction materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1073, 期 1-2, 页码 75-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.09.043

关键词

sample preparation; solid-phase extraction; multiclass pesticide analysis; tomatoes; method validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) multiresidue determination of six pesticides in tomatoes was developed and validated. Silica-based C-18 (octadecyl) and NH2 (aminopropyl) solid-phase extraction (SPE) sorbents, made in our laboratory, were used for sample preparation. The SPE materials were obtained by thermal immobilization of appropriate polysiloxanes onto 40 mu m silica surfaces and were used in sample preparation for multiresidue analysis of the following pesticides: tebuthiuron and diuron (urea herbicides), simazine, atrazine and ametryn (triazines herbicides) and benomyl (benzimidazol fungicide). The results were compared with similar commercial materials. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) using a Purospher RP- 18 5 mu m column and ACN: 0.01% aqueous NH4OH, pH 8.4 (35:65, v/v) as mobile phase, at 0.7 ml min(-1), with 235 nm UV detection, was used for separation and quantification of the pesticides. Method validation was performed at three fortification levels (100, 200, 1000 mu g l(-1)). Limits of detection and quantification show that the methods developed can be used to detect the pesticides in concentrations below the maximum residue levels (MRL) established by the Codex Alimentarius, USA, European Union and Brazilian legislations. The results showed that aminopropyl materials have a better performance than the octadecyl sorbents. Laboratory-made materials give results similar to commercial sorbents, with recoveries and precisions in agreement with directives for method validation in residue analysis. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据