4.7 Article

Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 mediates neurotoxin-induced degradation of the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 19, 页码 4823-4834

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1331-05.2005

关键词

Cdk5; MEF2; neuronal apoptosis; neurotoxicity; transcription factor; caspase

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG023695, AG19193] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD39446] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulation of the process of neuronal death plays a central role both during development of the CNS and in adult brain. The transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 ( MEF2) plays a critical role in neuronal survival. Cyclin- dependent kinase 5 ( Cdk5) mediates neurotoxic effects by phosphorylating and inhibiting MEF2. How Cdk5- dependent phosphorylation reduces MEF2 transactivation activity remained unknown. Here, we demonstrate a novel mechanism by which Cdk5, in conjunction with caspase, inhibits MEF2. Using primary cerebellar granule neuron as a model, our investigation reveals that neurotoxicity induces destabilization of MEF2s in neurons. Destabilization of MEF2 is caused by an increase in caspase- dependent cleavage of MEF2. This cleavage event requires nuclear activation of Cdk5 activity. Phosphorylation by Cdk5 alone is sufficient to promote degradation of MEF2A and MEF2D by caspase- 3. In contrast to MEF2A and MEF2D, MEF2C is not phosphorylated by Cdk5 after glutamate exposure and, therefore, resistant to neurotoxin- induced caspase-dependent degradation. Consistently, blocking Cdk5 or enhancing MEF2 reduced toxin- induced apoptosis. These findings define an important regulatory mechanism that for the first time links prodeath activities of Cdk5 and caspase. The convergence of Cdk5 phosphorylation- dependent caspase- mediated degradation of nuclear survival factors exemplified by MEF2 may represent a general process applicable to the regulation of other survival factors under diverse neurotoxic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据