4.6 Article

Electroporation as a prime/boost strategy for naked DNA vaccination against a tumor antigen

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 10, 页码 6292-6298

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6292

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have developed novel DNA fusion vaccines encoding tumor Ags fused to pathogen-derived sequences. This strategy activates linked T cell help and, using fragment C of tetnus toxin, amplification of anti-tumor Ab, CD4(+), and CD8(+) T cell responses is achievable in mice. However, there is concern that simple DNA vaccine injection may produce inadequate responses in larger humans. To overcome this, we tested electroporation as a method to increase the transfection efficiency and immune responses by these tumor vaccines in vivo in mice. Using a DNA vaccine expressing the CTL epitope AH1 from colon carcinoma CT26, we confirmed that effective priming and tumor protection in mice are highly dependent on vaccine dose and volume. However, suboptimal vaccination was rendered effective by electroporation, priming higher levels of AH1-specific CD8(+) T cells able to protect mice from tumor growth. Electroporation during priming with our optimal vaccination protocol did not improve CD8(+) T cell responses. In contrast, electroporation during boosting strikingly improved vaccine performance. The prime/boost strategy was also effective if electroporation was used at both priming and boosting. For Ab induction, DNA vaccination is generally less effective than protein. However, prime/boost with naked DNA followed by electroporation dramatically increased Ab levels. Thus, the priming qualities of DNA fusion vaccines, integrated with the improved Ag expression offered by electroporation, can be combined in a novel homologous prime/boost approach, to generate superior antitumor immune responses. Therefore, boosting may not require viral vectors, but simply a physical change in delivery, facilitating application to the cancer clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据