4.6 Article

Gastrointestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury is lectin complement pathway dependent without involving C1q

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 10, 页码 6373-6380

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6373

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56086, HL52886, R01 HL052886-08, R01 HL052886-09, R01 HL056086-07S1, R01 HL056086-08, R01 HL056086-09, R01 HL063927-04, HL063927] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [1F32DK67782-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complement activation plays an important role in local and remote tissue injury associated with gastrointestinal ischemia-reperfusion (GI/R). The role of the classical and lectin complement pathways in GI/R injury was evaluated using C1q-deficient (C1q KO), MBL-A/C-deficient (MBL-null), complement factor 2- and factor B-deficient (C2/fB KO), and wild-type (WT) mice. Gastrointestinal ischemia (20 min), followed by 3-h reperfusion, induced intestinal and lung injury in C1q KO and WT mice, but not in C2/fB KO mice. Addition of human C2 to C2/fB KO mice significantly restored GI/R injury, demonstrating that GI/R injury is mediated via the lectin and/or classical pathway. Tissue C3 deposition in C1q KO and WT, but not C2/fB KO, mice after GI/R demonstrated that complement was activated in C1q KO mice. GIN significantly increased serum alanine aminotransferase, gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction, and neutrophil infiltration into the lung and gut in C1q KO and WT, but not C2/fB KO, mice. MBL-null mice displayed little gut injury after GI/R, but lung injury was present. Addition of recombinant human MBL (rhuMBL) to MBL-null mice significantly increased injury compared with MBL-null mice after GI/R and was reversed by anti-MBL mAb treatment. However, MBL-null mice were not protected from secondary lung injury after GI/R. These data demonstrate that C2 and MBL, but not C1q, are necessary for gut injury after GI/R. Lung injury in mice after GI/R is MBL and C1q independent, but C2 dependent, suggesting a potential role for ficolins in this model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据