4.5 Article

Cellular factors required for protection from hyperoxia toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 93-101

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20041914

关键词

glutathione; hyperoxia; mitochondrion; reactive oxygen species; superoxide dismutase; yeast

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32 ES007141, ES 07141] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 50016, GM 66594, F32 GM066594, R01 GM050016, R37 GM050016] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prolonged exposure to hyperoxia represents a serious danger to cells, yet little is known about the specific cellular factors that affect hyperoxia stress. By screening the yeast deletion library, we have identified genes that protect against high-O-2 damage. Out of approx. 4800 mutants, 84 were identified as hyperoxia-sensitive, representing genes with diverse cellular functions, including transcription and translation, vacuole function, NADPH production, and superoxide detoxification. Superoxide plays a significant role, since the majority of hyperoxia-sensitive mutants displayed cross-sensitivity to superoxide-generating agents, and mutants with compromised SOD (superoxide dismutase) activity were particularly vulnerable to hyperoxia. By comparison, factors known to guard against H2O2 toxicity were poorly represented amongst hyperoxia-sensitive mutants. Although many cellular components are potential targets, our studies indicate that mitochondrial glutathione is particularly vulnerable to hyperoxia damage. During hyperoxia stress, mitochondrial glutathione is more susceptible to oxidation than cytosolic glutathione. Furthermore, two factors that help maintain mitochondrial GSH in the reduced form, namely the NADH kinase Pos5p and the mitochondrial glutathione reductase (Glr1p), are critical for hyperoxia resistance, whereas their cytosolic counterparts are not. Our findings are consistent with a model in which hyperoxia toxicity is manifested by superoxide-related damage and changes in the mitochondrial redox state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据