4.5 Article

Separation of native prion protein (PrP) glycoforms by copper-binding using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 371-378

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20041291

关键词

copper; glycosylation; glycotyping; immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC); prion protein (PrP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conformational conversion of the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) into the pathology-associated PrPSc isoform is a key event in TSEs (transmissible spongiform encephalopathies). The host PrPC molecule contains two N-linked glycosylation sites and binds copper under physiological conditions. In contrast with PrPC, PrPSc is insoluble in non-ionic detergents and does not bind to CU2+ ions. Hence, we utilized copper binding to separate and characterize both PrP isoforms. Infected and uninfected murine brain and bovine stem brain specimens were treated with the mild non-ionic detergent n-octyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside (octylglucoside) to maintain the native PrP conformations during isolation. The solubilized homogenates were loaded on to CU2+-saturated IMAC (immobilized metal affinity chromatography) columns and eluted using the chelating agent EDTA. Fractions were separated by SDS/PAGE and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies for glycosylation profiling. Whereas native PrPC and denatured PrPSc were retained by a Cu2+-loaded resin, native PrPSc and PrPres [PK (proteinase K)-resistant PrP] passed through the column. We demonstrate here that the IMAC technique is appropriate to isolate and partially purify PrPC from healthy brains in its native-like and biologically relevant glycosylated copper-binding forms. The IMAC technique is also well suited for the separation of native PrPC from aggregated PrPSc in infected brains. Our results indicate that in contrast with PrPSc in uninfected as well as infected brains, PrPC is predominantly present in the glycosylated forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据