4.5 Article

Accrual of MRI white matter abnormalities in elderly with normal and impaired mobility

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 232, 期 1-2, 页码 23-27

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.12.017

关键词

elderly; normal and impaired-mobility; automated; longitudinal; volumetric; determination; white matter signal abnormality

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41RR13218] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01AG022092, UO1AG09675] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White matter signal abnormality (WMSA) is often present in the MRIs of older persons with mobility impairment. We examined the relationship between impaired mobility and the progressive accrual of WMSA. Mobility was assessed with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and quantitative measures of gait and balance. Fourteen subjects had baseline and follow-up MRI scans performed 20 months apart. WMSA was detected and quantified using automated computer algorithms. In the control subjects, WMSA volume increased by 0.02 +/- 0.05% ICCV (percent intracranial cavity volume)/year while the WMSA of mobility impaired subjects increased five-times faster (0.10 +/- 0.10 ICCV/year, p=0.03). WMSA volume was related to some of the mobility measures and was sensitive to change which was not true of the other MRI variables. The study demonstrates the sensitivity of longitudinal automated volumetric analysis of WMSA to differentiate differences in the accrual rate of WMSA in groups selected on the basis of mobility. Based on these results, we propose that a subset of subjects with mobility impairment have accelerated, disease related WMSA accrual, thus explaining the rapid progression of mobility impairment in some older persons without apparent cause. This study demonstrates that quantitative MRI and performance measures can provide valuable insight into the rate of progression and pathophysiologic abnormalities underlying mobility impairment. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据