4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 128-141

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.033

关键词

Compound geothermal power cycles; Flash systems; Organic Rankine cycle (ORC); System optimization; Maps of application scopes; Techno-economic analysis

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Engineering [2016-XZ-25-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both thermodynamic performance and techno-economic analysis of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems have been investigated in this study. Thermodynamic analysis were carried out for four power generation systems: single-flash (SF) system, double-flash (DF) system, flash-ORC (FORC) system; and double-flashORC (DFORC) system. By choosing the maximum net power output as an objective function, optimization is done based on comparisons among the four systems with a goal of increasing the net power output by 20% under the condition that the SF is replaced by one of the compound systems (DF, FORC, and DFORC). As an original contribution, five maps useful for real applications have been generated for selecting optimum geothermal power cycles under different geofluid's conditions, with consideration of five ORC working fluids (R123, R152a, isobutane, n pentane and R245fa). The boundaries that determine whether the compound systems have advantages over the SF system are functions of the geofluid temperature, geofluid dryness, and the type of the working fluid used by the ORC. In the techno-economic study, Levelized Electricity Cost (LEC) and Payback Period (PBP) analyses were carried out. The results from the LEC and PBP studies show good agreement. For the three scenarios analyzed, each of the compound power systems has a better engineering economic performance than the SF system. For the common heat source condition investigated, comparison among the three compound systems shows that the DF system has a lowest levelized electricity cost and the shortest payback period; the FORC and DFORC show similar techno-economic performance and have advantages over the SF system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据