4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Stable phosphinous acids

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 690, 期 10, 页码 2382-2387

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.09.041

关键词

phosphinous acids; phosphane oxide; trifluoromethyl; pentalluorophenyl

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electronic properties of organyl element compounds are strongly influenced by the electronic characteristics of the organic substituents. The bonding of two CF3 groups to a phosphorus atom effects a drastically decreased basicity. That is the phosphorus atom is the least basic centre in the compound (CF3)(2)POH. This compound, synthesized in 1960 by Burg and Griffiths, is the only known example of a phosphinous acid, although there should be a general interest in this class of compounds. However, only a few investigations have been reported which may be explained by the tedious and risky synthesis. In this paper a safe one step and high yield synthesis of (CF3)(2)POH is described. The compound (C6F5)(2)POH, originally claimed as a phosphinous acid, is proved to exist at room temperature exclusively in the tautomeric oxide form. (C6F5)(2)P(O)H crystallizes in the triclinic space group P (1) over bar (no. 2) with a 992.9(1) pm; b 1501.9(2) pm; c 1539.4(2) pm; alpha 117.48(1)degrees; beta 100.39(1)degrees; gamma 96.02(1)degrees and Z 6. Quantum chemical investigations prove the electron withdrawing effect of s-triazinyl groups (1,3,5-triazin-4-yl derivatives) to be much stronger than that of pentafluorophenyl groups. Quantum chemical calculations at the B3PW91/6-311G(3d,p) level of theory predict for the bis(s-triazinyl) derivative (C3N3H2)(2)POH the phosphinous acid isomer to be favored by Delta E-ZP = 22 kJ/mol in relation to the corresponding phosphane oxide isomer. The phosphinous acid (CF3)(2)POH (C, symmetry) is favored at the same level of theory by about Delta E-ZP = 14 kJ/mol compared with the phosphane oxide structure (C-s symmetry). (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据