4.7 Article

The effects of stress on androgen production, spermiation response and sperm quality in high and low cortisol responsive domesticated male striped bass

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 246, 期 1-4, 页码 413-422

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.12.019

关键词

stress responsiveness; striped bass; cortisol; reproduction; androgen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Domesticated male striped bass were selected as high cortisol stress responders (HCR) or low cortisol stress responders (LCR) by ranking mean 1-h post-stress plasma cortisol levels following a 2-min standardized net challenge once per month for four consecutive months. During the selection period, HCR and LCR fish maintained a significant divergence in post-stress cortisol levels, but these differences were abolished coincident with the onset of sexual maturation. LCR fish stressed monthly during gonadal maturation and weekly during the spawning season had plasma testosterone (T) and 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) levels 3-5 times lower than stressed HCR fish. During the simulated spawning season, plasma cortisol and glucose levels were moderately elevated but similar in HCR and LCR fish. There were no differences in sperm quality between HCR and LCR males; however, more HCR fish began spermiating earlier and maintained a spermiation response longer than LCR fish. There were no significant differences in weight, length or coefficient of condition, but HCR fish had a significantly greater specific growth rate on two sample intervals when compared to LCR fish. These results show that male striped bass selected for low cortisol stress responsiveness and exposed to repeated stress have diminished circulating levels of T and 11-KT associated with a shorter duration spermiation response when compared to males selected for high cortisol stress responsiveness. The data suggest that LCR male striped bass subjected to significant stress during maturation and spawning may have impaired reproductive performance. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据