4.6 Article

Neuronal differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells modulates kinin B2 receptor gene expression and function

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 20, 页码 19576-19586

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M502513200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinins are vasoactive oligopeptides generated upon proteolytic cleavage of low and high molecular weight kininogens by kallikreins. These peptides have a well established signaling role in inflammation and homeostasis. Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that bradykinin and other kinins are stored in the central nervous system and may act as neuromediators in the control of nociceptive response. Here we show that the kinin-B2 receptor (B2BKR) is differentially expressed during in vitro neuronal differentiation of P19 cells. Following induction by retinoic acid, cells form embryonic bodies and then undergo neuronal differentiation, which is complete after 8 and 9 days. Immunochemical staining revealed that B2BKR protein expression was below detection limits in nondifferentiated P19 cells but increased during the course of neuronal differentiation and peaked on days 8 and 9. Measurement of [Ca2+](i) in the absence and presence of bradykinin showed that most undifferentiated cells are unresponsive to bradykinin application, but following differentiation, P19 cells express high molecular weight neurofilaments, secrete bradykinin into the culture medium, and respond to bradykinin application with a transient increase in [Ca2+](i). However, inhibition of B2BKR activity with HOE-140 during early differentiation led to a decrease in the size of embryonic bodies formed. Pretreatment of differentiating P19 cells with HOE-140 on day 5 resulted in a reduction of the calcium response induced by the cholinergic agonist carbamoylcholine and decreased expression levels of M1-M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, indicating crucial functions of the B2BKR during neuronal differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据