4.8 Article

Intermolecular electron-transfer mechanisms via quantitative structures and ion-pair equilibria for self-exchange of anionic (Dinitrobenzenide) donors

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 127, 期 20, 页码 7411-7420

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja051063q

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Definitive X-ray structures of separated versus contact ion pairs, together with their spectral (UV-NIR, ESR) characterizations, provide the quantitative basis for evaluating the complex equilibria and intrinsic (self-exchange) electron-transfer rates for the potassium salts of p-dinitrobenzene radical anion (DNB-). Three principal types of ion pairs, K(L)+DNB-, are designated as Classes S, M, and C via the specific ligation of K+ with different macrocyclic polyether ligands (L). For Class S, the self-exchange rate constant for the separated ion pair (SIP) is essentially the same as that of the free anion, and we conclude that dinitrobenzenide reactivity is unaffected when the interionic distance in the separated ion pair is r(SIP) 2: 6 A. For Class M, the dynamic equilibrium between the contact ion pair (with r(CIP) = 2.7 A) and its separated ion pair is quantitatively evaluated, and the rather minor fraction of SIP is nonetheless the principal contributor to the overall electron-transfer kinetics. For Class C, the SIP rate is limited by the slow rate of CIP reversible arrow SIP interconversion, and the self-exchange proceeds via the contact ion pair by default. Theoretically, the electron-transfer rate constant for the separated ion pair is well-accommodated by the Marcus/Sutin two-state formulation when the precursor in Scheme 2 is identified as the separated inner-sphere complex (ISSIP) of cofacial DNB-/DNB dyads. By contrast, the significantly slower rate of self-exchange via the contact ion pair requires an associative mechanism (Scheme 3) in which the electron-transfer rate is strongly governed by cationic mobility of K(L)(+) within the contact precursor complex (ISCIP) according to the kinetics in Scheme 4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据