4.8 Article

Parametric and working fluid analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) used in engine waste heat recovery

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 1188-1198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.027

关键词

Dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC); System performance; Energy and exergy analysis; Operating load

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51206117]
  2. National Basic Research (973) Program of China [2011CB707201]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [12JCQNJC04400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) is proposed in this study, which consists a high-temperature (HT) loop and a low-temperature (LT) loop to recover the waste heat of the exhaust, engine coolant and residual heat of the HT loop. Net output power, utilization rate of engine coolant, DORC thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency are chosen as the objective functions. R124, R134a, R245fa, R600, R600a and R1234yf are chosen as the candidate working fluids of the LT loop. Based on engine data and pre-set model parameters, energy and exergy analysis are conducted. Results show that maximum net output power, utilization rate of the engine coolant and exergy efficiency are obtained with R1234yf at T-evp,T-HT = 570 K and T-evp,T-LT = 343 K and corresponding values are 36.77 kW, 96.8% and 55.05%. The top two eta th are obtained with R600 and R245fa at T-evp,T-HT = 570 K and T-evp,T-LT = 365 K and corresponding values are 20.07% and 20.06%. Furthermore, based on the R1234yf-based system operating at T-evp,T-HT = 570 K and T-evp,T-LT = 343 K, the maximum irreversibility occurs in turbine and exergy efficiency of evaporator E-3,E-LT is worst, which are the optimization objectives for the improvement of system exergy performance. In addition, based on P-net, eta th and eta(e), for all working fluids, system performs better at high operating load. R1234yf is found to be a better working fluid for high operating load. R124 possesses the worst performance under all operating loads. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据