4.6 Article

Electrolytic lesions to nucleus accumbens core and shell have dissociable effects on conditioning to discrete and contextual cues in aversive and appetitive procedures respectively

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 160, 期 2, 页码 222-235

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.12.012

关键词

trace conditioning; contextual conditioning; nucleus accumbens; dopamine

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nucleus accumbens (n. acc.) has been implicated in conditioning to both discrete and contextual cues but its precise role is as yet controversial because conflicting patterns of effect have been reported. These inconsistencies may relate to the extent to which the lesions used encroach on different subfields of n. acc. and the use of different task variants. The present study compared the effects of selective lesions of shell and core subfields of nucleus accumbens (n. acc.) across aversive and appetitive trace conditioning variants. In both experiments, an auditory stimulus was contiguous with footshock or food, or presented at a trace interval. A continuous flashing light in each case provided an experimental background stimulus. Conditioning to the cues provided by the experimental chambers was also assessed. Rats with electrolytic lesions to the n. acc. shell and core showed different patterns of effect in aversive (Experiment 1) and appetitive (Experiment 2) variants of this procedure. In Experiment 1. the core lesion reduced the difference between trace and contiguously conditioned groups, in responding to the discrete noise stimulus. However, neither lesion had any detectable effect on contextual conditioning, In Experiment 2, the shell lesion clearly increased contextual conditioning, selectively in the trace conditioned group, but neither lesion had any detectable effect on discrete cue conditioning, Thus, whilst the shell and core lesions produced dissociable effects on discrete cue and contextual conditioning. the conclusions to be drawn depend on the procedural variant in use. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据