4.8 Article

Passive vapor-feed direct methanol fuel cell using sintered porous metals to realize high-concentration operation

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 143-149

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.045

关键词

Direct methanol fuel cell; Vapor-feed; Passive; Sintered porous metal; Neat methanol; Pervaporation membrane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51475172, 51275180]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2013040016899]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013ZM0003]
  4. Open Fund of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-Walled Structures [2013001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of methanol vapor is helpful to reduce the effect of methanol crossover in a direct methanol fuel cell. This study develops a passive vapor-feed direct methanol fuel cell (VF-DMFC) based on a pervaporation membrane and sintered porous metals which act as functional layers for effective control of the mass transfer process. The feasibility of using this method is experimentally validated. For the cathode, a sintered porous metal-fiber plate (SPMFP) with great hydrophobicity is used as a water management layer to enhance water back diffusion from the cathode to the anode. Results indicate that the use of a SPMFP promotes a higher cell performance especially when a higher methanol concentration is used. The highest peak power density of 19.3 mW/cm(2) is achieved at an ambient temperature when 12 M methanol is supplied. Neat-methanol operation is also viable under this condition. The cathode current collector (CC) with a window-like pattern yields a higher cell performance than the parallel-channel. For the anode, the use of a hydrophilic sintered porous metal-powder plate (SPMPP) embedded in the anode CC reduces the cell performance due to limitation of methanol delivery. This work also reports the influences of methanol concentration and vapor chamber temperature. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据