4.6 Article

Costs associated with persistent allergic rhinitis are reduced by levocetirizine

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 60, 期 6, 页码 788-794

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00820.x

关键词

antihistamine; cost; levocetirizine; persistent allergic rhinitis; time lost

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Allergic rhinitis was recently classified by the ARIA guidelines as persistent or intermittent. Levocetirizine was shown to improve symptoms and health-related quality of life of patients with persistent allergic rhinitis in the XPERTTM study, a 6-month randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. Objective: To assess the total costs of persistent allergic rhinitis, and the effect of long-term treatment with levocetirizine on these costs from several perspectives (societal, social security system, and employers). Methods: Direct medical cost parameters (medications, physician visits and hospitalizations) and time lost parameters (workdays and Usual Daily Activities (UDA) lost) related to persistent allergic rhinitis and its comorbidities (asthma, sinusitis, otitis and upper respiratory infection) were measured. A cost analysis was performed using 2002 French costing data. Results: From a societal perspective, the total cost of persistent allergic rhinitis without long-term treatment was estimated at e355.06/patient/month. From a social security perspective, levocetirizine treatment yielded an additional cost of e2.78/patient/month, compared to no-treatment. However, levocetirizine reduced the total cost of persistent allergic rhinitis and its comorbidities by e152.93/patient/month from a societal perspective and by e64.70/patient/month from an employer perspective. Most gains resulted from a decrease in the lost workdays and UDA in the levocetirizine group. Conclusion: The cost of persistent allergic rhinitis is substantial. Treatment with levocetirizine reduces the cost of persistent allergic rhinitis and its comorbidities to the society by e152.93/patient/month while improving symptoms and health-related quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据