4.8 Article

Evaluation of alternatives for microalgae oil extraction based on exergy analysis

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 226-236

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.065

关键词

Microalgae biomass; Exergy analysis; Oil extraction; Third generation biofuels

资金

  1. Ibero-American Program on Science and Technology for Development (CYTED) project [306RTO279]
  2. UNESCO [330303, 332205, 530603, 330999]
  3. Colombian Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation COLCIENCIAS through Francisco Jose de Caldas Scholarship Programs [CT 475-2007, CT 272-2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several technologies for microalgae oil extraction are being evaluated in order to find the most adequate for large scale microalgae processing. In this work, exergy analysis was used as an instrument for screening three design alternatives for microalgae oil extraction in a large-scale process and as a decision-making tool for evaluation and selection of novel technologies from the energy point of view. Routes were simulated using dedicated industrial process simulation software, taking as feedstock a representative and robust modeled composition of Chlorella sp. microalgae biomass. Mass, energy and exergy balances were performed for each alternative, and physical and chemical exergies of streams and all specific microalgae constituents modeled were calculated with the help of the thermodynamic properties of biomass components and operating conditions of streams. Exergetic efficiencies, total process irreversibilities, energy consumption and exergy destruction were calculated for all solvent-based microalgae oil extraction pathways evaluated. It was shown that exergy analysis led to identify the hexane-based oil extraction (HBE) as the most adequate alternative of the routes assessed for scaling up from the energy point of view, presenting a maximum exergy efficiency of 51% and exergetic losses of 982,000 MJ considering a production of 104,000 t of microalgae oil per year. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据