4.3 Article

Confirmation of potential herbicidal agents in hulls of rice, Oryza sativa

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1339-1352

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-5290-5

关键词

Oryza sativa L.; Gramineae; rice hull composition; hentriacontane; 1-tetratriacontanol; beta-sitosterol; momilactone A; roomilactone B; tricin; beta-sitosterol-3-O-beta-D-glucoside; herbicidal activity; Lemna paucicoslata; Hegelm 381; germination assay in culture tube

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ethyl acetate extract of Oryza sativa (rice) hulls yielded seven compounds: hentriacomane, 1-tetratriacontanol, beta-sitosterol, momilactone A, momilactone B, tricin (a flavonoid), and beta-sitosterol-3-O-beta-D-glucoside. The structures of these compounds were elucidated with 500 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), using 1D and 2D spectral methods, aided by electron ionization mass spectrometry (EI-MS), fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (FAB-MS), infrared (IR), and ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometry. The complete H-1 NMR assignments for momilactone A and B and C-13 NMR assignments for tricin are discussed. To the best of our knowledge, hentriacomane, 1-tetratriacontanol, and beta-sitosterol-3-O-beta-D-glucoside were identified for the first time in rice hulls. In biological activity tests using these identified compounds, momilactone A and B showed potent inhibitory activity against duckweed (Lemna paucicostata). 1-Tetratriacontanol and beta-sitosterol-beta-O-beta-D-glucoside also showed about 13-20% inhibitory activity based on chlorophyll reduction. Hentriacontane and beta-sitosterol did not show any herbicidal activity. In a germination assay of three weed species (Leptochloa chinenesis L., Amaranthus retroflexus L., and Cyperus difformis L.) in culture tubes both momilactones A and B had high inhibitory effects. Momilactone B completely inhibited germination of all three weed species at 20 ppm. Germination of L. chinensis L. was completely inhibited by a 4 ppm solution of momilactone B.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据