4.6 Article

Effects of adeno-associated virus DNA hairpin structure on recombination

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 11, 页码 6801-6807

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.11.6801-6807.2005

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL051818, HL06673, HL051818, P01 HL066973] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI048074, R01 AI048074] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30DK065988, P30 DK065988] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM059299, GM059299] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hairpin DNA ends are evolutionarily conserved intermediates in DNA recombination. The hairpin structures present on the ends of the adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome are substrates for recombination that give rise to persistent circular and concaterneric DNA episomes through intramolecular and intermolecular recombination, respectively. We have developed circularization-dependent and orientation-specific self-complementary AAV (scAAV) vectors as a reporter system to examine recombination events involving distinct hairpin structures, i.e., closed versus open hairpins. The results suggest that intramolecular recombination (circularization) is far more efficient than intermolecular recombination (concatemerization). Among all possible combinations of terminal repeats (TRs) involved in intermolecular recombination, the closed-closed TR structures are twice as efficient as the open-open TR substrates for recombination. In addition, both intramolecular recombination and intermolecular recombination exhibit the common dependency on specific DNA polymerases and topoisomerases. The circularization-dependent and orientation- specific scAAV vectors can serve as an efficient and controlled system for the delivery of DNA structures that mimic mammalian recombination intermediates and should be useful in assaying recombination in different experimental settings as well as elucidating the molecular mechanism of recombinant AAV genome persistence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据