4.8 Article

Bio-syngas to gasoline and olefins via DME - A comprehensive techno-economic assessment

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 54-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.015

关键词

Techno-economic assessment; Thermochemical biorefinely; Process design and simulation; Dimethyl ether (DME); Gasoline; Olefins

资金

  1. Baden-Wurttemberg Ministry of Agriculture (MLR)
  2. Agency of Renewable Resources (FNR) of the German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU program) [AP2010-0119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of low-grade lignocellulosic biomass such as residual wood or straw to synthetic fuels and chemicals is currently being developed within the bioliq (R) concept (at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology - KIT, Germany). The aim of this study is to model and assess three different synthesis process concepts with DME (dimethyl ether) as a platform chemical. The process concepts are designed and assessed using existing technologies, as well as the previous studies for pyrolysis and gasification sections. The respective considered products in the selected concepts are synthetic gasoline, ethylene and propylene. Using biomass for these applications can reduce fossil CO2 emissions by replacing non-renewable carbon sources. The techno-economic assessment concludes that total energy efficiency ranges between 37.5% and 41.1% for the production of gasoline and olefins, respectively. The resulting specific production cost in the gasoline concept is 72% higher than the current market price. In the olefins concept the difference to the current market prices of ethylene and propylene is reduced to 40%. The specific production costs in the gasoline and ethylene concept are 59% higher than current market prices. The possibility to sequestrate CO2 within the considered concepts at costs of 39 (sic)/t allow additional revenues from sequestrated CO2. In order to meet current market prices, the implications of sequestrated CO2, mineral oil tax reduction and the combination of both kinds of subsidies are evaluated in this study. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据