4.8 Article

Enhanced methane productivity from manure fibers by aqueous ammonia soaking pretreatment

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 104-111

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.075

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Aqueous ammonia soaking; Manure fibers; Methane potential; Pretreatment

资金

  1. EUDP, Energistyrelsen, Copenhagen under RETROGAS project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The necessity of increasing the methane productivity of manure based biogas plants has triggered the application of anaerobic digestion to the separated solid fraction of manure, with the challenge that its high lignocellulosic fibers content is difficult to digest and thus makes anaerobic digestion process slow and economically unfavourable. In the present study, aqueous ammonia soaking (AAS) was investigated as a pretreatment method to increase methane potential of swine manure fibers. 3 days at 22 degrees C were the optimal conditions among the ones tested (1, 3, and 5 days at 22 and 55 degrees C) for increasing the methane potential of manure fibers. AAS pretreatment exhibited a significant effect on methane production rate and potential. It was found that MS for 3 days at 22 degrees C resulted at a 30-80% and 178% increase in methane yield from digested and raw manure fibers, respectively. Batch anaerobic digestion of MS-treated digested manure fibers could stand loadings as high as 100 g TS/l inoculum with no inhibition problems. Enzymatic hydrolysis tests applied to MS-pretreated fibers resulted to 80% and 65% hydrolysis efficiency of glucan and xylan compared to insignificant numbers for non-pretreated fibers confirming thus that AAS effect on methane yield and production rate is due to the facilitation of hydrolysis step of anaerobic digestion process. This is attributed to AAS directly affecting the disintegration step and thus releasing carbohydrates, which can be further hydrolyzed, from the lignocellulosic matrix. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据