4.2 Article

Refractory coeliac disease

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.02.001

关键词

refractory coeliac disease; gluten-free diet; abnormal IEL phenotype; clonality; immunosuppressive therapy; chemotherapy; bone-marrow transplantations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A small proportion of coeliac disease (CID) patients fail to improve after a gluten-free diet (GFD) and may be considered as atypical regarding their outcome (refractory coeliac disease). The aim of this study is to diagnose and manage patients with CID who fail to improve after a GFD. Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) is a malabsorption syndrome defined by persisting villous atrophy with, usually, an increase of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in the small bowel in spite of a strict GFD and comprises a heterogenous group of diseases. Some of these diseases have to be excluded and can be treated by specific therapies like antibiotics in tropical sprue and giardiasis and immune globulin substitution in common variable immunodeficiency, while other malabsorption syndromes are less well defined and may require immunosuppressive therapy. Standardized treatment, however, has not been evaluated in such patients so far. In a subgroup of patients with RCD, an abnormal intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) population may be observed with the lack of surface expression of usual T-cell markers (CD3-CD8 and/or the T-cell receptor (TCR)) on IELs associated with T-cell clonality pattern suggest the presence of an early enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) in a subgroup of patients with RCD. This hypothesis has been supported by studies, which revealed progression into overt intestinal T-cell lymphomas in a subgroup of RCD. Steroid treatment has been reported effective even in patients with underlying early EATL. However, long-term results are unsatisfactory in most of these patients with RCD and parenteral nutrition has to be applied in some of these cases. First results with more aggressive chemotherapies and use of cytokines are under way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据