4.8 Article

Theoretical studies of a hybrid ejector CO2 compression cooling system for vehicles and preliminary experimental investigations of an ejector cycle

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 931-942

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.032

关键词

Hybrid ejector system; Exhaust gas; Simulation; Experimental investigation; Ejector cycle

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council First Grant Scheme [EP/G011591/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/G011591/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents theoretical investigations into a hybrid ejector and CO2 vapour compression (VC) system for road transport cooling. The purpose is to utilise the waste heat from exhaust gas and the VC subsystem to drive the ejector system, whose cooling effect will be employed to subcool the VC sub-system. Exploitation of the energy consumption ratio between ejector sub-system and CO2 VC sub-system indicated that the more energy obtained from exhausted gas, the better system performance could be achieved for CO2 VC sub-system, and hence higher cooling capacity of the VC sub-system at the same compression power. Thermodynamic simulations of two sub-systems and the hybrid system were presented. The results indicated that, at boiler temperature of 120 degrees C, evaporator temperature of 10 degrees C, a COP of 0.584 was achieved for hybrid system, with 22% improvement over a single ejector cycle. Preliminary experimental studies were carried out on a single ejector cycle, with boiler temperatures between 115 degrees C and 130 degrees C, and evaporator temperatures between 5 degrees C and 10 degrees C. The effects of various operation conditions on the overall ejector operation were coherently analysed. The COP of the ejector sub-system from experimental results was approximately 85% compared with simulation results, which showed a good agreement between theoretical analysis and experimental results. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据