4.8 Article

Computer-aided conversion of an engine from diesel to methane

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 8-23

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.002

关键词

Dual fuel engine; Combustion chamber; Structural analysis; CFD; Genetic algorithms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes an analytical methodology that uses empirical based models and CFD simulations to efficiently evaluate design alternatives in the conversion of a diesel engine to either CNG dedicated or dual fuel engines. The procedure is performed in five steps. Firstly, a database of different combustion chambers that can be obtained from the original piston is obtained. The chambers in the database differ for the shape of the bowl, the value of the compression ratio, the offset of the bowl and the size of the squish region. The second step of the procedure is the selection, from the first database, of the combustion chambers able to resist to the mechanical stresses due to the pressure and temperature distribution at full load. For each combination of suitable combustion chamber shape and engine control parameters (ignition/injection crank angle, EGR, etc.), a CFD simulation is used to evaluate the combustion performance of the engine. Then, a post-processing procedure is used to evaluate the detonation tendency and intensity of each combination. All the tools developed for the application of the method have been linked in the ModeFrontier optimization environment in order to perform the final choice of the combustion chamber. The overall process requires not more of a week of computation on the four processor servers considered for the optimization. Moreover, the selected chambers can be obtained from the original piston of the engine. Therefore, the conversion cost of the engine is quite small compared with the case of a completely new piston. The paper also describes the application of the procedure to two different engines. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据