4.8 Article

Ionic liquids for biofuel production: Opportunities and challenges

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 406-414

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.031

关键词

Lignocellulosic biomass; Pretreatment; Vegetable oil; Transesterification; Ionic liquids

资金

  1. National Basic Research Development Program (973 Program) of China [2011CB200905, 2011CB200903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21176241]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGCX2-YW-337, KSCX2-YW-R-2, KSCX1-YW-11D1, 2011Y1GA01]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2102041]
  5. Institute of Processing Engineering, CAS [2007-072701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing concerns related to environmental pollution, energy security, and future oil supplies have encouraged the development of large-scale non-petroleum-based alternative fuels, such as bioethanol and biodiesel. Bioethanol made from inexpensive and abundant sources of lignocellulosic biomass, and biodiesel produced through the transesterification of vegetable oils or animal fats are highly desirable. To efficiently produce bioethanol and biodiesel from lignocellulosic biomass and vegetable oil, however, pretreatment and transesterification are generally required. These processes usually necessitate the use of environmentally harmful chemicals such as alkali, acidic, or organic solvents. Ionic liquids (ILs), due to their significant environmental benefits, process improvements, and uses as both solvents and catalysts, have attracted significant attention for their use in biofuel production. This paper reviews the applications and main factors affecting the use of ILs in the pretreatment, dissolution, and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass, as well as the synthesis and energy-efficient recycling of ILs. A new process for biodiesel production, in which ILs act as the co-solvents, catalysts, or enzyme supports in the oil transesterification process, is also discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据