4.6 Article

Managing a fateful alliance: anaemia and cardiovascular outcomes

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 16-20

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh1097

关键词

anaemia; chronic kidney disease; congestive heart failure; haemoglobin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a major cause of death in dialysis patients. Clinical studies have shown that anaemia is associated with reduced survival in patients with renal disease, heart failure or both. There is also evidence that, even in otherwise healthy individuals, anaemia is independently associated with an increased risk of CVD. The body adapts to anaemia by increasing cardiac output, which may result in cardiac remodelling and progression of left ventricular (LV) growth. Indeed, low haemoglobin (Hb) has been identified as an independent risk factor for LV growth in CKD patients, suggesting that there is a direct link between anaemia and adverse cardiac outcomes. This suggests that correction of anaemia with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO; epoetin) may improve prognosis. Partial correction of anaemia produces partial regression of LV hypertrophy, while complete correction of anaemia can help to prevent LV dilatation in haemodialysis patients with normal LV volumes. Moreover, in non-dialysis patients with advanced CVD, pilot studies showed that a moderate increase in Hb improved cardiac function and reduced hospitalization rates. In addition, consistent epoetin treatment before the start of dialysis was associated with a reduced risk of developing cardiac disease in CKD patients. In contrast, in dialysis patients with advanced cardiac disease, Hb normalization increased mortality risk. Therefore, early correction of anaemia appears important. The Cardiovascular risk Reduction by Early Anaemia Treatment with Epoetin P (CREATE) study is investigating whether this approach is associated with a measurable reduction in cardiovascular risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据